Managing Volunteers: Recruitment, Retention, and Relationship Building
Vol: 12, Issue: 1
2016
- 8,127Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage8,127
- Downloads7,681
- 7,681
- Abstract Views446
Article Description
This paper examines the nonprofit management dilemma of volunteer recruitment and retention. It argues that a focus on building relationships between new volunteers, the volunteer manager, and the volunteer community is the best way to navigate the psychological contract (PC). Drawing from Rousseau’s (1989) concept of a PC as “an individual’s beliefs regarding the terms and conditions of a reciprocal exchange agreement” (p. 123), when a volunteer signs on to work with an organization they form an understanding on what promises, conditions and agreements have been made (Farmer & Fedor, 1999). Through considering the group socialization model developed by Levine & Moreland (1994), this paper investigates how the various phases of volunteer engagement require different strategies for fulfilling the PC and which relationship building activities are most important to each phase. This paper contends that recruitment and retention are inextricably linked to one another and should both be considered through all the various phases of the socialization process.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know