Lessons Learned About Services Delivery to Victims of Domestic Violence During COVID 19 Mandatory Physical Distancing Orders
2022
- 653Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage653
- Downloads340
- Abstract Views313
Project Description
The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting social distancing guidelines have dramatically limited or excluded in-person services to domestic violence (DV) victims. Service providers have shifted to providing services to DV victims through telehealth as part of the COVID-19 physical restriction orders. This shift in services from in-person to telehealth has impacted the DV victims accessing services and has impacted the service delivery by the service providers. This study aimed to understand the lessons learned about service delivery to victims of domestic violence during the COVID-19 mandatory physical distancing and stay-home orders. This qualitative study used interviews via Zoom to collect data. The subjects were nine service providers working with domestic violence victims. The data revealed different stages of services when delivering services to the DV victims. These stages of services reported their own barriers, benefits, and strategies when they were using their designed method of provision of services (in-person, telehealth, or hybrid). The data found that service providers and DV clients preferred telehealth services over in-person services and reported the benefits of hybrid services. The data also found an increase in mental health symptoms as an impact of the pandemic for clients and service providers. Due to the limited literature on this topic, the current study is critical for social work practice; the findings of this study can be utilized to enhance preparedness and adopt new strategies and protocols when providing mandatory physical distancing services.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know