Media and Internet Censorship in India: A Study of its History and Political-Economy
Journal of International Technology and Information Management, Vol: 33, Issue: 1, Page: 1-47
2024
- 864Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage864
- Abstract Views432
- Downloads432
Article Description
The Indian Constitution, which came into force on January 26, 1950, guarantees various fundamental rights, such as the freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion, rights to form association, as well as rights to privacy. Yet, since the adoption of the Constitution, the Indian citizen has been subject to varying degrees of media censorship and surveillance. This paper seeks to delve into the historical evolution of media and Internet censorship and surveillance in India. It shows how media censorship of varying types have existed since the British colonists introduced restrictive laws in order to expand and control the native populations. Upon independence, these laws perpetuated the interests of India’s new leaders, who have continued building upon the colonial era laws. All governments have used these laws to capture and hold on to power. This paper provides a qualitative analysis of the history and political economy of 200 years of media (and more recently, Internet) censorship and surveillance in India, the laws that enable them, their political and social history, methods of implementation, and legal, economic, and social ramifications. The paper concludes by offering some remedies.
Bibliographic Details
John M. Pfau Library, California State University San Bernardino
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know