“Exploring Writers Block”
2014
- 71Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage71
- Abstract Views71
Interview Description
My research question will focus on the causes of Writer's Block and how this phenomenon can be counteracted. My question is significant because Writer's Block occurs to writers throughout various fields of study. The fact that Writer's Block is so widespread renders it an important issue to explore more deeply. By culling from various sources, I hope to find greater insight on the subject matter as well as a better understanding of its roots and means for mitigating it. I aim to serve the conference's audience members through my research by providing them insight on this common phenomenon that many of them may face frequently. Methods: My project draws from sources that regard the issue of writer's block through the lenses of different fields of study. This includes Psychology, Kinesiology, and even Neurology as it deals with writing and creativity. Intended Results: I expect to glean an understanding of Writer's Block and its counterbalance(s) to be an amalgamation of varying factors. Final Statement: This project's implications not only contribute to the field of Composition, but also to the widespread fields of study that employ writing.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know