Downfall: 1933
2017
- 14Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
Interview Description
It is no secret, that the democratic western world is fraught by internal divisions, economic insecurity, and ethnic nationalism. Right-wing populist movements and anti-international parties such as AfD (Germany), PVV (Netherlands), FPÖ (Austria), UKIP (United Kingdom) and others, currently flourish across Europe. However, this resurgence of populist sentiments and ethnic nationalism is nothing new and echoes of the 1930s crises that brought fascist ideologies into the political ‘mainstream’ across the continent and presented a very real existential threat to European democracy. My research explores the evolution of populist movements and the downfall of democratic systems using the development of the Nazi party and collapse of the German Weimar Republic as a case study. Populist movements do not emerge fully fledged, and I will demonstrate how the Nazi party in Germany evolved from a disparate collection of racial nationalists, anti-internationalists and anticapitalist socialists to become the party that destroyed a democratic society, launched a world war and the largest genocide in human history. Although none of the major populist parties active in Europe today have reached the level of influence, radicalization or overt aggression of the Nazi party, they spring from similar ideological foundations, predicated upon a phobia of outsiders and internationalism, fueled by economic insecurity. The current crop of populist parties may not be the Nazi party reborn, but they do represent a threat to democracy and Western liberalism as a whole.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know