A genome-wide analysis reveals no nuclear Dobzhansky-Muller pairs of determinants of speciation between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, but suggests more complex incompatibilities
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 6, Issue: 7, Page: 1-12
2010
- 68Citations
- 39Usage
- 134Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations68
- Citation Indexes67
- 67
- CrossRef57
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage39
- Downloads34
- Abstract Views5
- Captures134
- Readers134
- 134
Article Description
The Dobzhansky-Muller (D-M) model of speciation by genic incompatibility is widely accepted as the primary cause of interspecific postzygotic isolation. Since the introduction of this model, there have been theoretical and experimental data supporting the existence of such incompatibilities. However, speciation genes have been largely elusive, with only a handful of candidate genes identified in a few organisms. The Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts, which have small genomes and can mate interspecifically to produce sterile hybrids, are thus an ideal model for studying postzygotic isolation. Among them, only a single D-M pair, comprising a mitochondrially targeted product of a nuclear gene and a mitochondrially encoded locus, has been found. Thus far, no D-M pair of nuclear genes has been identified between any sensu stricto yeasts. We report here the first detailed genome-wide analysis of rare meiotic products from an otherwise sterile hybrid and show that no classic D-M pairs of speciation genes exist between the nuclear genomes of the closely related yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Instead, our analyses suggest that more complex interactions, likely involving multiple loci having weak effects, may be responsible for their post-zygotic separation. The lack of a nuclear encoded classic D-M pair between these two yeasts, yet the existence of multiple loci that may each exert a small effect through complex interactions suggests that initial speciation events might not always be mediated by D-M pairs. An alternative explanation may be that the accumulation of polymorphisms leads to gamete inviability due to the activities of anti-recombination mechanisms and/or incompatibilities between the species' transcriptional and metabolic networks, with no single pair at least initially being responsible for the incompatibility. After such a speciation event, it is possible that one or more D-M pairs might subsequently arise following isolation. © 2010 Kao et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957330180&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686707; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003; https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/chem_mat_eng_pub/44; https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=chem_mat_eng_pub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1001038; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.t003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know