Holocaust narratives : exploration of the emotional impact of disclosure status among first, second, and third generation Holocaust survivors
2016
- 466Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage466
- Downloads364
- Abstract Views102
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The current study explored the possible relationship between disclosure of Holocaust related narratives and emotional well-being among Holocaust survivors as well as children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors. This study further considered how methods of disclosure and number of disclosure methods used related to emotional wellbeing and overall benefit or harm of the disclosure experience among first, second, and third generation Holocaust survivors. A sample of 147 Holocaust survivors and descendants completed an online survey consisting of Likert scales to rate the perceived benefit or harm of their disclosure experience and opportunities to offer narrative describing their disclosure experience. Three groups formed based on participant survivor status: first generation (n=29), second generation (n=74), and third generation (n=11). Results showed the vast majority of participants disclosed their Holocaust related narratives; however, disclosure did not relate to overall emotional wellbeing. Approximately 86% rated their disclosure experience at least beneficial; the more methods of disclosure used related to participants’ rating disclosure as more beneficial. This study also discovered the both/ and influence of an audience (i.e. telling family/friends, speaking at a community event, etc.) to the disclosed narrative – a receptive audience related to great benefit while a skeptical audience related to great harm. While preliminary in nature, these findings reflect the importance of considering the environment that will hear the trauma narrative before attempting disclosure. This research indicates the need for further exploration of factors predicting the benefits of disclosure.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know