The Application of Disciplinary Punishment And it's Legal Justification
Vol: 2009, Issue: 38
2021
- 80Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage80
- Downloads57
- Abstract Views23
Article Description
This research paper deals with the authority extent the administration has in disciplinary punishment, and the role of the Punishment Council, as a surveillance body, in establishing legaljustification behind punitive judgment. It is by ipso jure that the responsibility of carrying out disciplinary punishment lies upon the administration which is directly linked to the party which committed the violation. On the other hand, the Punishment Council holds an authoritative position only in terms of evaluating the graveness of the contravention and providing legaljustification for the punishment; otherwise, the act of punishment itself is the responsibility of the administration.In this perspective, the research aims to deliberate two main related issues:Defining and analyzing the administration concerned with the application of disciplinary punishment.Penalty effectiveness and its justification
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know