Lucile Speer Interview, March 24, 1981
Lucile Speer Interviews Oral History Project, OH 046, Archives and Special Collections, Mansfield Library, University of Montana-Missoula
1981
- 45Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage45
- Downloads24
- Abstract Views21
Recorded Work Description
Lucile Speer reminisces on the final days of the 1971-1972 Montana Constitutional Convention. She notes that higher education issue was solved by a compromise of allowing the Montana Legislature to continue allocating a certain amount of the state’s budget for higher education, but creating a Board of Regents that determined how the money was spent. Speer recalls how a special committee was appointed for planning the final day of the convention with a closing ceremony that was open to the public. She offers a vivid account of how emotions ran high that day due to concerns from members and supporters of the Farm Bureau over changes to the constitution that they felt would hurt farming interests. Speer tells how Governor Forrest Anderson supported the constitution and got it signed before the Farm Bureau could file a suit against it. She recalls how every delegate signed the constitution, but that a number of delegates, particularly those from Eastern Montana, worked with the Farm Bureau to defeat it when it was put to the Montana public for a vote. Speer describes her frustration with Leo Graybill for referring to her as “Mrs.” rather than “Ms.” during the convention proceedings.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know