A New Canon
2019
- 42Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage42
- Abstract Views42
Poster Description
Literature is at the center of everything in the discipline of English. It does not matter what your area of study is in English you will be taking multiple courses covering literature. Most of the literature taught is the same books that have been taught for decades. They are part of the literary canon based upon a list of great works people should read that was made years ago, and few college classes shy away from said canon. In recent years there has been more women and minority writers added to certain classes, but for the most part the canon continues to be dominantly white male authors. The biggest question is: why not open up the canon completely? All literature can be considered good literature to someone. Why not include things such as popular literature or young adult/children’s literature to college courses? Who gets to choose what is canon, and why is the canon so important? My project will look at these questions while also making the case as to why the canon should be opened up completely
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know