Apologies: What do we know?
International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), ISSN: 1473-4192, Vol: 8, Issue: 2, Page: 215-231
1998
- 73Citations
- 43Usage
- 65Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations73
- Citation Indexes73
- 73
- CrossRef67
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Usage43
- Abstract Views43
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
Article Description
This paper reviews research on apologies, considering research goals and results in assessing the ‘maturity’ of apology research. It is argued that such research needs to progress beyond a descriptive goal to an explanatory goal in terms of the underlying cultural assumptions that inform the perception of contextual factors which in turn inform apology behavior. © 1998 Wiley. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937179260&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00130.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00130.x; https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/3888; https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4889&context=facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00130.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00130.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know