Philosophy of Environmental Regulation
Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol: 79, Issue: 3, Page: 131-134
1972
- 52Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage52
- Downloads40
- Abstract Views12
Article Description
The American public has become aware of environment. Our world view has suddenly changed to recognize that our resources are limited and that we live in a closed compartment of destiny with all mankind. This new world view is most graphically dramatized by man's space travels. We have seen pictures of spaceship earth. We have seen proof that our ecological system is a closed one. Aside from solar energy, there are no significant inputs or outputs of energy, resources, or wastes. This new world view has far reaching effects. Our earlier world view, particularly in the United States, was one of unlimited resources and opportunities. Nurtured by a frontier spirit, we believed that there were always new areas to be conquered. Air, water, and other natural resources were considered inexhaustible. If one area became spoiled, there were always new areas to be discovered and developed. Now we know that this earlier world view is not, if it ever was, valid. Man and all other life must exist within earth's recycling ecology. There are no passengers on spaceship earth, only crew. With this new world view, great public pressures are building for pollution abatement. The American public seems willing to devote the resources and efforts need to begin to deal with environmental preservation. Significant steps are being taken to devise and implement laws and regulations to protect and restore our environment. Unfortunately, however, the new world view has also created an escalation in rhetoric.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know