The implementation of positive descriptive feedback based on daily assessment in a college developmental mathematics class
Page: 1-118
2007
- 386Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage386
- Abstract Views386
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The objective of this study is to examine if daily assessment, with positive feedback, during a college Developmental Mathematics class will help change students' academic performance. The data includes two classifications of college students: daily quizzed group with positive feedback, and the non daily quizzed group. The group that is quizzed daily is called the treatment group and the group not quizzed daily is called the comparison group. Data collected include a student survey on academic standings, and attitudes, pre- and post-examinations on selected problem solving concepts, and daily assessments. Quantitative methodologies are utilized to assess whether there are significant changes on student performances from pre- and post-exams, and between the academic performances of the treatment group quizzes. The treatment group consists of assessing 12 students in a ten minute interval, Monday through Friday for four weeks. The findings indicate that assessing on a daily basis with positive feedback, does not result in a statistically significant change on mean scores from pre-test to post-test.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know