D-Optimal Joint Best Linear Unbiased Predictors In Progressively Type-Ii Ordered Statistics
2024
- 9Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Reliability and life-testing experiments play a crucial role in understanding the longevity and performance of systems and components, particularly in high-stakes applications such as engineering, manufacturing, and quality control. In this thesis, we focus on the prediction of future unobserved failure times by employing joint predictors based on progressively Type-II censored data obtained from such life-testing experiments. Specifically, we derive explicit analytical expressions for the joint best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) of two future order statistics under the D-optimality criterion. The derivation involves minimizing the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix of the predictors within the context of progressively Type-II censored schemes. This approach ensures that the resulting joint predictors are D-optimal, establishing them as a highly efficient choice for predicting unobserved future data points.One of the primary contributions of this work is the detailed comparison between joint predictors and marginal predictors, which is accomplished by analyzing the design efficiency in various scenarios. By evaluating efficiency measures such as D-efficiency and Trace-efficiency, the analysis highlights the strengths of joint prediction approaches over marginal predictions in terms of gaining efficiency and thus improving reliability outcomes. This comparison provides valuable insights into the practical benefits of employing joint predictors when analyzing reliability data from life-testing experiments on progressively Type-II censored data. Additionally, the study also investigates the conditions under which joint BLUPs do not exist, demonstrating the inherent limitations and challenges of using such predictors under specific situations.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know