Endogeneity in panel stochastic frontier models: an application to the Japanese cotton spinning industry
Applied Economics, ISSN: 1466-4283, Vol: 49, Issue: 59, Page: 5935-5939
2017
- 87Citations
- 617Usage
- 69Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations87
- Citation Indexes82
- 82
- Policy Citations5
- 5
- Usage617
- Downloads571
- Abstract Views46
- Captures69
- Readers69
- 69
Article Description
We present a panel stochastic frontier model that handles the endogeneity problem. This model can treat the endogeneity of both frontier and inefficiency variables. We apply our method to examine the technical efficiency of Japanese cotton spinning industry. Our results indicate that market concentration is endogenous, and when its endogeneity is properly handled, it has a larger negative impact on the technical efficiency of cotton spinning plants. We find that the exogenous model substantially overestimates efficiency in concentrated markets.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85027533505&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861; https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/ef_fac/23; https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=ef_fac
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know