Subtle Worlds: Exploring Relational Ecology with Clay
2022
- 85Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage85
- Downloads48
- Abstract Views37
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The frameworks by which the globally-dominant culture expects individuals to understand and act within their environments are founded upon practices of oppression, division, and control, and have played an outsized role in the global crises faced in the modern era. Manifold currents of thought have developed alternatives to these trends from fields as diverse as Environmental Humanities, Feminist Theory, Post-Colonial Theory, Art Studies, Cybernetics and Systems Theory, Poetry, Political Science, and Science-Fiction, to name a few. Shared themes of these alternatives include the rekindling of respect for the agentic power of non-human things inside and outside human contexts, and the dissolution of socially constructed boundaries, both qualities that are unnecessarily diminished by the Scientism underpinning dominant cultural onto-epistemologies. Through art, a practice filled with the potential to transgress the boundaries of the Dominant culture, this thesis explores relationships, community, identity, and presence as they ebb, flow, and shift amongst humans and non-humans alike. This exploration is centered on Ceramics as an integrated collaboration between a multitude of forces, including the artist, audience, kilns, clay bodies, glazes, traditions, tools, and more, and reveals an expansive and emergent mesh of vibrant actors. By sitting with and validating more complex frameworks for understanding and relating to the worlds we exist in, it becomes possible to imagine a world in which vast choirs of influencing forces become more clear, allowing us to nurture an acceptance of the immense diversity of human, non-human, and non-living kin, prioritizing respect, curiosity, and reciprocality.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know