Forest Restoration and Parasitoid Wasp Communities in Montane Hawai'i
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: e59356
2013
- 16Citations
- 81Usage
- 71Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef12
- Usage81
- Downloads79
- Abstract Views2
- Captures71
- Readers71
- 71
Article Description
Globally, most restoration efforts focus on re-creating the physical structure (flora or physical features) of a target ecosystem with the assumption that other ecosystem components will follow. Here we investigate that assumption by documenting biogeographical patterns in an important invertebrate taxon, the parasitoid wasp family Ichneumonidae, in a recently reforested Hawaiian landscape. Specifically, we test the influence of (1) planting configurations (corridors versus patches), (2) vegetation age, (3) distance from mature native forest, (4) surrounding tree cover, and (5) plant community composition on ichneumonid richness, abundance, and composition. We sampled over 7,000 wasps, 96.5% of which were not native to Hawai'i. We found greater relative richness and abundance of ichneumonids, and substantially different communities, in restored areas compared to mature forest and abandoned pasturelands. Non-native ichneumonids drive these differences; restored areas and native forest did not differ in native ichneumonid abundance. Among restored areas, ichneumonid communities did not differ by planting age or configuration. As tree cover increased within 120 m of a sampling point, ichneumonid community composition increasingly resembled that found in native forest. Similarly, native ichneumonid abundance increased with proximity to native forest. Our results suggest that restoration plantings, if situated near target forest ecosystems and in areas with higher local tree cover, can facilitate restoration of native fauna even in a highly invaded system. © 2013 Gould et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875121590&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527171; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsfac/102; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102&context=rsfac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0059356; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059356&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059356.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know