Relationship between food waste, diet quality, and environmental sustainability
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 13, Issue: 4, Page: e0195405
2018
- 250Citations
- 284Usage
- 834Captures
- 184Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations250
- Citation Indexes233
- 233
- CrossRef20
- Policy Citations17
- Policy Citation17
- Usage284
- Downloads212
- Abstract Views72
- Captures834
- Readers834
- 834
- Mentions184
- News Mentions171
- News171
- Blog Mentions13
- Blog13
Most Recent Blog
Going Down the Drain: How Much Food Is Wasted in the U.S.?
How much food is wasted in the U.S.? Learn where garbage disposal waste goes when food scraps go down your sink and alternative food waste options.
Most Recent News
Solutions to combat food waste emissions at home
Discarded food not only burdens our waste management systems; it also is a growing offender in our climate crisis. "Food waste, if it was its
Article Description
Improving diet quality while simultaneously reducing environmental impact is a critical focus globally. Metrics linking diet quality and sustainability have typically focused on a limited suite of indicators, and have not included food waste. To address this important research gap, we examine the relationship between food waste, diet quality, nutrient waste, and multiple measures of sustainability: use of cropland, irrigation water, pesticides, and fertilizers. Data on food intake, food waste, and application rates of agricultural amendments were collected from diverse US government sources. Diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2015. A biophysical simulation model was used to estimate the amount of cropland associated with wasted food. This analysis finds that US consumers wasted 422g of food per person daily, with 30 million acres of cropland used to produce this food every year. This accounts for 30% of daily calories available for consumption, one-quarter of daily food (by weight) available for consumption, and 7% of annual cropland acreage. Higher quality diets were associated with greater amounts of food waste and greater amounts of wasted irrigation water and pesticides, but less cropland waste. This is largely due to fruits and vegetables, which are health-promoting and require small amounts of cropland, but require substantial amounts of agricultural inputs. These results suggest that simultaneous efforts to improve diet quality and reduce food waste are necessary. Increasing consumers’ knowledge about how to prepare and store fruits and vegetables will be one of the practical solutions to reducing food waste.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0195405; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045635045&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668732; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.t001; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/calsfac/145; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&context=calsfac; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsfac/151; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151&context=rsfac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195405&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0195405
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know