Gender Diversity on US Corporate Boards and its Impact on Sustainable Reporting
2021
- 28Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage28
- Abstract Views28
Poster Description
Nonfinancial aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) are of increasing interest to stakeholders as the desire for transparency, effectiveness, and long-term value creation within companies grows. As a result, research into what increases the quality of a sustainability report has grown in tandem. Board diversity is one of the factors considered in relation to sustainability report quality. Prior studies conclude that greater board diversity is related to a higher quality sustainability report. However, most research does not focus on what aspect(s) of board diversity impacts the quality. Furthermore, most research focuses on sustainability reporting in its broadest form, overlooking some important subsections. With this in mind, my research focuses on how board gender diversity impacts environmental, social, and the combined impact of these two on the content of a company’s sustainability report. My research also extends prior work by including both the sustainability report as well as the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Form 10-Ks. Different from the prior research findings, I find that board gender diversity does not positively relate to the content of a company’s sustainability report or MD&A. These results provide an interesting contradiction to the rest of the field.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know