The Impact of Cooperative Learning Methods Grades 6-12
2020
- 1,548Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,548
- Downloads1,317
- 1,317
- Abstract Views231
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Cooperative Learning methods are reviewed compared to traditional teaching methods in grades 6-12. Grades 6-12 present a time when students are beginning to explore careers and understanding their niche in the world of work. The research question centers on does cooperative learning contribute to greater student achievement than traditional learning. Five key student success markers were explored, including: self-efficacy, achievement, cater to diverse learners, collaboration, and promoting critical thinking to answer the research question. Many cooperative learning method experts’ methods were looked into including Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Think Pair Share, (TPS), Student Team Achievement Division (STAD), Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Problem Based Learning (PBL), Jigsaw, Co op Co op, Reading-Concept-Map-Timed-Pair-Share (Remap-TmPs) model, Learning Together, Line@, Activity Based, and Collaborative Argumentation. Cooperative Learning methods were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Analysis of Covariance (ANOVA), and SPSS 15.0 statistical software to determine, in most studies that cooperative learning methods are more effective in student learning than traditional methods. Commonalities were found in researchers focus to provide the reader with a better understanding of why cooperative learning works so well in grades 6-12 across the world.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know