The dynamic disc model: a systematic review of the literature
Physical Therapy Reviews, ISSN: 1743-288X, Vol: 14, Issue: 3, Page: 181-189
2009
- 15Citations
- 59Usage
- 50Captures
- 6Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- CrossRef15
- 12
- Usage59
- Abstract Views59
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
- Mentions6
- References6
- Wikipedia6
Review Description
Background: The intervertebral disc (IVD) has been implicated in the etiology and pathogenesis of spine pain. Examination and treatment approaches directed at the IVD often cite a biomechanical principle referred to as the dynamic disc model (DDM), which is hypothesised to account for positional changes of the nucleus pulposus (NP). The DDM proposes a predictable pattern of NP migration in response to movements and positioning; consequently, this model has served the basis for many clinical decisions. Objectives: The purpose of this manuscript was to systematically review the available research pertaining to the DDM in human discs. Methods: A literature review was conducted by two investigators independently using the MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE.com and CINAHL databases and the following key words independently and in combination: intervertebral disc, nucleus pulposus, nucleus migration, disc model, disc loading and dynamic disc model. Results from each researcher were pooled and studies were manually cross-referenced yielding 12 articles. Results: A predictable in vitro and in vivo pattern of NP movement was identified with the NP migrating anterior during extension and posterior during flexion in the normal IVD. Limited and contradictory data were available to support this model in the symptomatic and degenerative IVD. No studies were identified in the cervical and thoracic spine above the T10 level. Discussion: Available research supports the DDM of NP migration; however, an inconsistent pattern of migration may exist in patients with symptomatic and/or degenerative intervertebral discs. Future research is needed to evaluate the DDM in the cervical and thoracic spine and in abnormal discs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84879886470&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174328809x452827; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/174328809X452827; http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ptr/2009/00000014/00000003/art00004; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/174328809X452827; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hpd_pt_facarticles/166; https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=hpd_pt_facarticles; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/12184; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=13183&context=scopus2000
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know