GIS-assisted object detection and geospatial localization
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 8694 LNCS, Issue: PART 6, Page: 602-617
2014
- 45Citations
- 1Usage
- 84Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations45
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef17
- Patent Family Citations3
- Patent Families3
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
Conference Paper Description
Geographical Information System (GIS) databases contain information about many objects, such as traffic signals, road signs, fire hydrants, etc. in urban areas. This wealth of information can be utilized for assisting various computer vision tasks. In this paper, we propose a method for improving object detection using a set of priors acquired from GIS databases. Given a database of object locations from GIS and a query image with metadata, we compute the expected spatial location of the visible objects in the image. We also perform object detection in the query image (e.g., using DPM) and obtain a set of candidate bounding boxes for the objects. Then, we fuse the GIS priors with the potential detections to find the final object bounding boxes. To cope with various inaccuracies and practical complications, such as noisy metadata, occlusion, inaccuracies in GIS, and poor candidate detections, we formulate our fusion as a higher-order graph matching problem which we robustly solve using RANSAC. We demonstrate that this approach outperforms well established object detectors, such as DPM, with a large margin. Furthermore, we propose that the GIS objects can be used as cues for discovering the location where an image was taken. Our hypothesis is based on the idea that the objects visible in one image, along with their relative spatial location, provide distinctive cues for the geo-location. In order to estimate the geo-location based on the generic objects, we perform a search on a dense grid of locations over the covered area. We assign a score to each location based on the similarity of its GIS objects and the imperfect object detections in the image. We demonstrate that over a broad urban area of >10 square kilometers, this semantic approach can significantly narrow down the localization search space, and occasionally, even find the correct location. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84906354756&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_39; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_39; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_39; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2010/9221; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10220&context=scopus2010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_39; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_39
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know