UCF Liver Patch Batch 04
2024
- 17Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage17
- Downloads15
- Abstract Views2
Dataset Description
Pathologists diagnose biopsy samples with a stained specimen on the glass slide through a microscope. The entire specimen can be stored as a Whole Slide Image (WSI) for further analysis. However, managing and manually diagnosing hundreds of images is time-consuming and requires specific expertise. As a result, there is extensive ongoing research for computer-aided diagnosis of these digitally acquired pathology images. Deep learning has gained significant attention for its effectiveness with disease classification and segmentation of cancer cells from pathology images. For deep learning, a large number of annotated images are needed to build a robust and accurate model. However, there is a scarcity of a large number of annotated public images to validate and build a new model based on pathology images. To combat this limitation, we are introducing a public dataset where a large number of histopathology WSIs available from cadavers containing tissues of multiple organs such as lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, etc. We extract patches from each of the WSIs while discarding the white spaces in the slide. Later, we use the ImageNet model to train the model based on our processed dataset and classify patches from the WSI. Included in this paper is access to the full ~1700 WSIs with accurate labels by trained pathologists. Our dataset can be used as a benchmark dataset for training and validating deep learning models which contain a large number of WSIs with millions of extracted patches representative of 15-20 organ classes.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know