Techniques for Empirical Testing of Parallel Random Number Generators
1998
- 476Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage476
- Downloads421
- Abstract Views55
Article Description
Parallel computers are now commonly used for computational science and engineering, and many applications in these areas use random number generators. For some applications, such as large-scale Monte Carlo simulations, it is crucial that the random number generator have good randomness properties. Many programs are available for testing the quality of sequential random number generators, but very little work has been done on testing parallel random number generators. We present some techniques for empirical testing of random number generators on parallel computers, using tests based on computational science applications as examples. In particular, we focus on tests based on parallel algorithms developed for Monte Carlo simulations of the two dimensional Ising model, for which exact results are known. Preliminary results of these tests are presented for several parallel random number generators.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know