Approach and coalescence of liquid drops in air
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, ISSN: 1539-3755, Vol: 88, Issue: 6, Page: 063010
2013
- 70Citations
- 225Usage
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations70
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef17
- Usage225
- Downloads213
- Abstract Views12
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
The coalescence of liquid drops has conventionally been thought to have just two regimes when the drops are brought together slowly in vacuum or air: a viscous regime corresponding to the Stokes-flow limit and a later inertially dominated regime. Recent work found that the Stokes-flow limit cannot be reached in the early moments of coalescence, because the inertia of the drops cannot be neglected then. Instead, the drops are described by an "inertially limited viscous" regime, where surface tension, inertia, and viscous forces all balance. The dynamics continue in this regime until either viscosity or inertia dominate on their own. I use an ultrafast electrical method and high-speed imaging to provide a detailed description of coalescence near the moment of contact for drops that approach at low speed and coalesce as undeformed spheres. These measurements support a description of coalescence having three regimes. Signatures both before and after contact identify a threshold approach speed for deformation of the drops by the ambient gas. © 2013 American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84891800425&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.88.063010; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24483560; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.063010; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.063010/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.063010; https://surface.syr.edu/phy/522; https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1556&context=phy
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know