Redefining the “border between two worlds”: Waterscapes of division, devotion, and development along the Panj River in the Pamir Mountains of Tajikistan
2018
- 94Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage94
- Abstract Views94
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Based on research conducted from May-August, 2017 in the Pamir Mountains of Tajikistan, I argue that local communities are redefining the Panj River border with Afghanistan. Drawing from critical border studies in political geography, this paper argues that border-making processes and practices along the Panj River border can be understood as socioecological through three particular “waterscapes”: (1) divison; (2) devotion; and (3) development. Whereas in the past, the Panj River border stood as a division “between two worlds,” data collected through interviews and participant observation indicates that this legacy of division is being contested by water users in Tajikistan in order to establish cross-border collaboration on climate change-related water issues with neighboring communities in Afghanistan. I contend that this collaboration currently draws on pre-modern and pre-Soviet conceptions of territory in the region, which highlight a shared geography and history of Ismaili-Islamic devotion. I also contend that while water users have made great inroads in building cross-border collaboration with communities in Afghanistan, their efforts are nonetheless limited by broader political economic networks of international aid and development. International development in the region operates through cycles of available funding with which local water user associations are able to carry out aspirations and plans toward a less divided and more secure environmental future. Without funding, there is still much confusion as to how this future along the Panj River border will be realized.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know