Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Young Adults Following Covid-19
2021
- 118Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage118
- Downloads75
- Abstract Views43
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, may cause a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response that could lead to cardiovascular damage and cause individuals recovering from COVID-19 to be at an increased risk for future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Physical activity (PA) is inversely associated with systemic inflammation and CVD risk, which may make it a useful cardioprotective lifestyle factor for individuals recovering from COVID-19. Purpose: 1) Compare arterial stiffness and systemic inflammatory levels between individuals recovering from COVID-19 and uninfected controls, 2) explore systemic inflammation as a predictor of arterial stiffness, and 3) explore PA as a mediator for the relationship for COVID-19 history with arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis was performed on 23 SARS-CoV-2 participants (8M/15F, 25.0±8.9 years, 24.1±3.5 kg/m2) and 32 uninfected controls (14M/18F, 24.4±6.5 years, 25.1±3.5 kg/m2). Arterial stiffness, as a proxy for CVD risk, was estimated as pulse wave velocity (PWV) during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using an oscillometric blood pressure device. Systemic inflammation was assessed as salivary cytokine and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels collected using the passive drool method. PA was objectively measured via accelerometry and assessed as moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). An independent samples t-test was used to compare measures of arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation between the SARS-CoV-2 and control groups. Simultaneous multiple regression was used to assess how well proinflammatory cytokine and CRP levels predicted arterial stiffness. Mediational analysis was used to determine whether there is a significant indirect effect of COVID-19 history through MVPA on arterial stiffness and CRP levels. Results: Participants recovering from COVID-19 were studied, on average, 111.6±118.3 days after testing positive, experienced 5.2±3.8 symptoms, and had mild COVID-19 disease severity. The results from independent samples t-test showed no significant differences (all p>0.05) between the SARS-CoV-2 and control group in PWV (5.0±0.5 m/s vs 5.1±0.5 m/s) , IL-8 (821.1±772.6 pg/mL vs 843.8±958.4 pg/mL), IL-1β (126.3±102.2 pg/mL vs 143.6±157.9 pg/mL), IL-6 (11.7±25.4 pg/mL vs 5.9±7.9 pg/mL), TNF-α (4.8±3.9 pg/mL vs 5.1±5.9 pg/mL), or CRP (765.4±672.9 pg/mL vs 526.3±674.8 pg/mL). Additionally, the combination of IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP were not found to significantly predict PWV, with no individual measure of systemic inflammation significantly contributing to the regression equation (all p>0.05). Finally, mediational analysis did not find a significant indirect effect of COVID-19 history through MVPA on PWV (estimate = 0.0220, 95% CI = -0.0488 – 0.2427) or of COVID-19 history through MVPA on CRP levels (estimate = 0.0254, 95% CI = -0.0675 – 0.1646). Conclusion: This investigation found no differences in arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation between young adults recovering from COVID-19 and uninfected controls. Additionally, systemic inflammation was not found to be a significant predictor of arterial stiffness. Finally, MVPA was not found to significantly mediate the relationship for COVID-19 history with arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know