An Evaluation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program
2014
- 352Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage352
- Downloads280
- Abstract Views72
Report Description
This report takes a holistic approach to understanding the Children’s Health Insurance Program in order to discern the ways in the political tradeoffs made to enable its passage affect its ability to meet the health needs of America’s children. The history and legislative development of this program is discussed first, with emphasis on the reauthorization efforts from 2007 to 2009. The second part of the report is an econometric analysis of Louisiana’s Children’s Health Insurance Program, LaCHIP. This analysis seeks to establish a relationship between the adoption of “best practices” in the administration of LaCHIP and the resulting changes in the incidence of unmet health needs among children eligible for the program. The analysis concludes that the adoption of one best practice in isolation did not have an effect on the odds of an eligible child having an unmet health need.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know