Thermal reactionomes reveal divergent responses to thermal extremes in warm and cool-climate ant species
BMC Genomics, ISSN: 1471-2164, Vol: 17, Issue: 1, Page: 171
2016
- 18Citations
- 115Usage
- 87Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef16
- Usage115
- Downloads108
- Abstract Views7
- Captures87
- Readers87
- 87
Article Description
Background: The distributions of species and their responses to climate change are in part determined by their thermal tolerances. However, little is known about how thermal tolerance evolves. To test whether evolutionary extension of thermal limits is accomplished through enhanced cellular stress response (enhanced response), constitutively elevated expression of protective genes (genetic assimilation) or a shift from damage resistance to passive mechanisms of thermal stability (tolerance), we conducted an analysis of the reactionome: the reaction norm for all genes in an organism's transcriptome measured across an experimental gradient. We characterized thermal reactionomes of two common ant species in the eastern U.S, the northern cool-climate Aphaenogaster picea and the southern warm-climate Aphaenogaster carolinensis, across 12 temperatures that spanned their entire thermal breadth. Results: We found that at least 2 % of all genes changed expression with temperature. The majority of upregulation was specific to exposure to low temperatures. The cool-adapted A. picea induced expression of more genes in response to extreme temperatures than did A. carolinensis, consistent with the enhanced response hypothesis. In contrast, under high temperatures the warm-adapted A. carolinensis downregulated many of the genes upregulated in A. picea, and required more extreme temperatures to induce down-regulation in gene expression, consistent with the tolerance hypothesis. We found no evidence for a trade-off between constitutive and inducible gene expression as predicted by the genetic assimilation hypothesis. Conclusions: These results suggest that increases in upper thermal limits may require an evolutionary shift in response mechanism away from damage repair toward tolerance and prevention.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978766840&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934985; https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/casfac/89; https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=casfac; https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs/62; https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=utk_ecolpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/17/171; https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z; http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs/62; http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know