Evolutionary history and novel biotic interactions determine plant responses to elevated CO and nitrogen fertilization
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 12, Page: e114596
2014
- 4Citations
- 58Usage
- 48Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Usage58
- Downloads50
- Abstract Views8
- Captures48
- Readers48
- 48
Article Description
A major frontier in global change research is predicting how multiple agents of global change will alter plant productivity, a critical component of the carbon cycle. Recent research has shown that plant responses to climate change are phylogenetically conserved such that species within some lineages are more productive than those within other lineages in changing environments. However, it remains unclear how phylogenetic patterns in plant responses to changing abiotic conditions may be altered by another agent of global change, the introduction of non-native species. Using a system of 28 native Tasmanian Eucalyptus species belonging to two subgenera, Symphyomyrtus and Eucalyptus, we hypothesized that productivity responses to abiotic agents of global change (elevated CO and increased soil N) are unique to lineages, but that novel interactions with a non- native species mediate these responses. We tested this hypothesis by examining productivity of 1) native species monocultures and 2) mixtures of native species with an introduced hardwood plantation species, Eucalyptus nitens,to experimentally manipulated soil N and atmospheric CO. Consistent with past research, we found that N limits productivity overall, especially in elevated CO conditions. However, monocultures of species within the Symphyomyrtus subgenus showed the strongest response to N (gained 127% more total biomass) in elevated CO conditions, whereas those within the Eucalyptus subgenus did not respond to N. Root:shoot ratio (an indicator of resource use) was on average greater in species pairs containing Symphyomyrtus species, suggesting that functional traits important for resource uptake are phylogenetically conserved and explaining the phylogenetic pattern in plant response to changing environmental conditions. Yet, native species mixtures with E. nitens exhibited responses to CO and N that differed from those of monocultures, supporting our hypothesis and highlighting that both plant evolutionary history and introduced species will shape community productivity in a changing world.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; 10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84918554903&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479056; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs/65; https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=utk_ecolpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0114596; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g001; http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs/65; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114596&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114596.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know