Principal Mental Models and Perceptions of Distributed Leadership
2015
- 909Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage909
- Downloads722
- Abstract Views187
Thesis / Dissertation Description
With growing pressure on school leaders to support collaboration and distribute leadership among teachers and staff, principals need guidance in examining their own mental models on these issues to challenge and improve their current ways of thinking. The purpose of this mixed methods, multi-site case study was to describe three middle school principals’ mental models of distributed leadership and to examine to what extent the three preconditions (leadership practice, relationships, and trust) from Angelle’s (2010) model of distributed leadership for middle schools existed in the three principals’ schools. Qualitative data included principal interviews, a written statement of leadership philosophy, a journal of leadership decisions, and field notes from observations. Quantitative data included two survey instruments completed by teachers in the three principals’ schools, the Omnibus T-Scale (Hoy & Tschannen-Moran, 2003) and the Organizational Climate Description for Middle Schools (Hoy, Hoffman, Sabo & Bliss, 1996). Results from this study confirmed and strengthened the findings of Angelle’s study and provided a lens of distributed leadership in practice in three middle school settings. The findings also suggested an additional element, principal mental models, as a necessary component for distributed leadership in middle schools. Findings from this study confirmed that the key to understanding distributed leadership is to connect what leaders know (mental models) with what they do (leadership practice and relationships) and how this is evidenced in the school (through trust). A model was developed to illustrate the key elements of distributed leadership connections.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know