A microbiological profile of commercially prepared salads
1975
- 20Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage20
- Downloads16
- Abstract Views4
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Samples of commercially prepared chicken salad, ham salad, potato salad, cole slaw, pimento cheese spread and several other types of salads from producers were analyzed microbiologically upon receipt and five days after the expiration date for aerobic plate count, psychrophilic plate count, coliform count and yeast and mold count. Plating was carried out by homogenizing ten grams of each salad with ten milliliters of 2 percent sodium citrate to a pipettable consistency in a Virtis homogenizer and pouring plates. Aerobic plate count ranges of less than 100 to greater than 30 million organisms per gram of fresh salad and from less than 100 to greater than 1.5 billion organisms per gram of salad after the expiration date were found. The psychrophilic plate count range was from less than 100 to 31 million organisms per gram of fresh salad and from less than 100 to greater than 970 million organisms per gram of salad after the expiration date. Coliform plate count ranges were from less than one to 1,990 coliforms per gram of salad after the expiration date. Yeast and mold plate count ranges were from less than one to greater than 300,000 organisms per gram of fresh salad and from less than one to greater than 300,000 organisms per gram of salad after the expiration date.. Bacteria from aerobic plate counts, psychrophilic plate counts and coliform counts were isolated according to differences in colony type and location in the agar. The bacteria were characterized for identification. Identified bacteria included eight species of Bacillus, six species of Lactobacillus, three species of Leuconostoc, five species of Streptococcus, three species of Micrococcus, one species of Escherichia, one species of Enterobacter and one species of Citrobacter. Members of the genera of Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas and Actinomyces were also found.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know