The “Referential Game” in Literary Texts
Vol: 44, Issue: 5, Page: 59-67
2025
- 265Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage265
- Downloads260
- Abstract Views5
Dataset Description
Language is like a chameleon. Unlike everyday discourse, one of the key features of literary texts is their ability to disrupt the stability of discourse's reference to reality and to construct complex and diverse referential relationships. This effort unleashes the referential potential of discourse, unfolding an intricate “referential game”. This kind of “misuse” of reference not only serves as the foundation of literary texts, but also enables literary discourse to continually explore the complex connections between real and unreal, possible and impossible relations. Through these “referential games”, the world appears in its many forms, enriching human experience with infinite diversity. Literary texts are the training ground for these “referential games”, where the magical qualities and rich connotations of language are fully displayed. It is in these games that the “poetic” and the “literary” take root and thrive.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know