Lung cancer screening in a community setting: Characteristics, motivations, and attitudes of individuals being screened
Health Psychology Open, ISSN: 2055-1029, Vol: 6, Issue: 1, Page: 2055102918819163
2019
- 11Citations
- 126Usage
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef10
- Usage126
- Downloads115
- Abstract Views11
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
We describe the characteristics of individuals being screened in community settings including factors influencing screening decisions and the level of information sought prior to screening. Individuals from two community-based radiology clinics (N = 27) were surveyed after screening. Screening efficacy and salience were the most important factors in screening decisions, whereas healthcare provider recommendations were rated not important. Half of participants reported no or little conversation about screening with their primary care provider, and 61.5 percent had not sought any information on screening. Individuals being screened in a community setting are unlikely to have sufficient information for an informed decision about screening.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059616268&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055102918819163; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643640; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055102918819163; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/behavsci_facpub/52; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=behavsci_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055102918819163
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know