Gadolinium free cardiovascular magnetic resonance with 2-point Cine balanced steady state free precession
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, ISSN: 1097-6647, Vol: 17, Issue: 1, Page: 90
2015
- 19Citations
- 123Usage
- 45Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- CrossRef19
- 18
- Usage123
- Downloads114
- Abstract Views9
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of ventricular structure and function is widely performed using cine balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) MRI. The bSSFP signal of myocardium is weighted by magnetization transfer (MT) and T1/T2-relaxation times. In edematous and fibrotic tissues, increased T2 and reduced MT lead to increased signal intensity on images acquired with high excitation flip angles. We hypothesized that acquisition of two differentially MT-weighted bSSFP images (termed 2-point bSSFP) can identify tissue that would enhance with gadolinium similar to standard of care late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Cine bSSFP images (flip angles of 5° and 45°) and native-T1 and T2 maps were acquired in one mid-ventricular slice in 47 patients referred for CMR and 10 healthy controls. Afterwards, LGE images and post-contrast T1 maps were acquired and gadolinium partition coefficient (GPC) was calculated. Maps of ΔS/S o were calculated as (S 45 -S 5 )/S 5 *100 (%), where S flip_angle is the voxel signal intensity. Twenty three patients demonstrated areas of myocardial hyper-enhancement with LGE. In enhanced regions, ΔS/S o, native-T1, T2, and GPC were heightened ( p < 0.05 vs. non-enhanced tissues). ΔS/S o, native-T1, and T2 all demonstrated association with GPC, however the association was strongest for ΔS/S o. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a slight bias towards larger volume of enhancement with ΔS/S o compared to LGE, and similar transmurality. Subjective analysis with 2-blinded expert readers revealed agreement between ΔS/S o and LGE of 73.4 %, with false positive detection of 16.7 % and false negative detection of 15.2 %. Gadolinium free 2-point bSSFP identified tissue that enhances at LGE with strong association to GPC. Our results suggest that with further development, MT-weighted CMR could be used similar to LGE for diagnostic imaging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097664723009158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84947044266&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520782; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1097664723009158; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cvrc_facpub/24; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=cvrc_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1; https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1; https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1; http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/17/1/90; http://jcmr-online.com/content/17/1/90; https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1; http://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-015-0194-1
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know