Use of the County Health Rankings by Local Health Departments in Florida, 2010 - 2011
Vol: 1, Issue: 3
2012
- 496Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage496
- Downloads326
- Abstract Views170
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
This paper describes how local health departments (LHDs) in Florida used the County Health Rankings over the first two years of their release (2010 – 2011). We surveyed LHD leadership to describe if, how and to what extent the Rankings were used by Florida’s 67 LHDs to improve the health of their communities and describe changes in use from the 2010 to the 2011 release. Our results indicate substantial use of the Rankings by Florida’s LHDs, particularly as applied to community health assessments, staff education, as a starting point for examining other indicators and databases, and in grant applications. From 2010 to 2011, we found significant increases in LHD use of the Rankings to build broad multisectoral community involvement in the solution of community health problems. However, media engagement with the Rankings appears to have decreased with time. A primary implication for public health practice is the apparent utility of the Rankings as a tool for community organizing around public health issues and communicating the multifactorial nature of health.
Bibliographic Details
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/frontiersinphssr/vol1/iss3/8; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=frontiersinphssr; http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/fphssr.0103.08; https://doi.org/10.13023%2Ffphssr.0103.08; https://dx.doi.org/10.13023/fphssr.0103.08; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/frontiersinphssr/vol1/iss3/8/
University of Kentucky Libraries
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know