Nitrogen Management of Forages in Relation to Gaseous Emissions – New Approaches and Considerations
2015
- 84Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage84
- Downloads48
- Abstract Views36
Artifact Description
Forages have a high N demand, a long growing season, and an effective root system all contributing to effective nutrient capture. However forages are restrictive in methods available for mitigating gaseous losses both as NH3 and as N2O, due to both practical and cost considerations. Strategies are needed to address the challenges of both N efficiency and N losses. Agronomic techniques in long term experiments can enhance estimates of N loss pathways and N efficiency, and demonstrate the importance of integrated multinutrient approaches. The dual manure stream concept divides manure into a thin fraction suitable as an N source for grass and a sludge fraction suitable as a P source for corn. While this represents an integrated approach, questions remain about alternate loss pathways. While grazing greatly reduces ammonia emissions it is not clear that grazing improves N use relative to confinement systems. The current levels of prospective mitigation of emissions are perhaps modest. However new approaches such as acidifying manure, novel nitrification inhibitor products, more durable legume stands, ongoing improvements in manure application methodology with increasing adoption by farmers, and novel integrated approaches will continue to make incremental improvements in reducing losses of nitrogenous gases and other reactive N species and improving nutrient efficiency of forages.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know