Risk-Based Project Development
2022
- 192Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage192
- Abstract Views124
- Downloads68
Report Description
Risk management is integral to highway project development. Managing risk entails identifying uncertainties which could influence project activities, understanding how they can be mitigated or eliminated, and monitoring risk during project development. Many state transportation agencies have introduced methods for identifying risks, determining whether risks are high impact or low impact, and generating response strategies. These methods are often qualitative or semi-quantitative in nature due to the challenge of quantifying the likelihood of a risk and its effects. These approaches are nonetheless valuable for helping designers and project development teams remain mindful of negative risks which could pose significant hurdles. Building on recent work for the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) on risk-based construction inspection, this report discusses the creation of an Excel tool for managing risk on highway projects. Leveraging information gathered via interviews with KYTC stakeholders, subject-matter experts, and consultants, the tool identifies risks associated with key decision points and key execution points for four project types: new road and expansion, road rehabilitation and resurfacing, new or replacement bridge, and bridge rehabilitation. Embedded in the tool are high-level discussions of risks often confronted when completing different activities as well as best practices for mitigating or eliminating those risks. The tool has been designed to accommodate periodic updates, which can ensure material reflects the most up-to-date thinking about risk management and recent agency experiences.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know