The Loch Ness Monster, Haggis, and a Lower Voting Age: What American can Learn from Scotland
American University Law Review, Vol: 69, Issue: 5, Page: 1433
2020
- 51Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage51
- Downloads42
- Abstract Views9
Article Description
This Article, prepared for an American University Law Reviewsymposium, explores what the United States can learn from Scotland's experiencein lowering the voting age to sixteen. The minimum voting age in Americanelections seems firmly entrenched at eighteen, based in part on the Twenty-SixthAmendment, which prohibits states from denying the right to vote to anyone agedeighteen or older. Yet the conversation about lowering the voting age to sixteen,at least for local elections, has gained steam in recent years. The debate inAmerica, however, is nascent compared to the progress in Scotland, whichlowered the voting age to sixteen for its Independence Referendum in 2014 andfor all Scottish elections in 2015. Using original research from interviews Iconducted in Scotland, this Article offers three main takeaways for Americanjurisdictions considering this reform: the Scottish experience in lowering thevoting age has been mostly successful because advocates (1) went into schools toregister students to vote and encourage them to participate; (2) offeredmeaningful civics education, though that instruction was somewhat unevenacross the country; and (3) created a bipartisan coalition of policymakers whosupported the change. As the debate on the voting age in the United Statesexpands, advocates should draw upon these lessons from Scotland.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know