Star formation and quenching among the most massive galaxies at z ~ 1.7
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 450, Issue: 1, Page: 763-786
2015
- 24Citations
- 239Usage
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef18
- Usage239
- Downloads231
- Abstract Views8
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
We have conducted a detailed object-by-object study of a mass-complete (M ≥ 10M) sample of 56 galaxies at 1.4 ≤ z ≤ 2 in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey-South field, showing that an accurate deblending in 24 μm images is essential to properly assign to each galaxy its own star formation rate (SFR), whereas an automatic procedure often fails. This applies especially to galaxies with SFRs below the main sequence (MS) value, which may be in their quenching phase. After that, the sample splits evenly between galaxies forming stars within a factor of 4 of the MS rate (~45 per cent), and sub-MS galaxies with SFRs ~10-1000 times smaller (~55 per cent). We did not find a well-defined class of intermediate, transient objects below the MS, suggesting that the conversion of a massive MS galaxy into a quenched remnant may take a relatively short time (< 1 Gyr), though a larger sample should be analysed in the same way to set precise limits on the quenching time-scale. X-ray detected AGNs represent a ~30 per cent fraction of the sample, and are found among both star-forming and quenched galaxies. The morphological analysis revealed that ~50 per cent of our massive objects are bulge-dominated, and almost allMS galaxies with a relevant bulge component host an AGN. We also found sub-MS SFRs in many bulge-dominated systems, providing support to the notion that bulge growth, AGN activity and quenching of star formation are closely related to each other.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929774458&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv608; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/450/1/763/1003932/Star-formation-and-quenching-among-the-most; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/450/1/763/18503541/stv608.pdf; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/physastron_facpub/275; https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=physastron_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv608; https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/450/1/763/1003932
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know