Path Forward to CCR Conveyor Solutions
2024
- 82Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage82
- Downloads55
- Abstract Views27
Artifact Description
CCR Unit closures and related beneficial use operations are centric to moving large volumes of material, predominantly, synthetic gypsum, fly ash and bottom ash. While trucking is the core haulage solution, site specific conditions do shift to conveyors as the optimal solution in many cases. While today many CCR closure plans and material handling processes are tentatively established, changes in anticipated material volumes cause increased focus on CCR harvesting, and the pending Legacy Rule or other regulatory action(s) may warrant reevaluation of the material transport alternatives. This presentation provides an overview of large scale CCR transport options, core strategies for material handling alternatives analysis, delivery methods and case histories where conveyors provided the power industry with the most cost effective and sustainable solution. Pipe conveyors are becoming a preferred alternative to CCR transport in many cases due to material confinement requirements and efficiency. An in- depth look at this conveying alternative has proven to be a preferred methodology for large scale CCR transport solutions. This presentation will also provide some of the pros and cons of the various conveyor configurations while considering the long-term objectives, carbon commitments, footprint, and regulatory requirements of these systems.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know