Subsurface Hydraulic Studies and Modeling to Support Injection Treatment and Hydraulic Containment at Impacted Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Sites
2024
- 50Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage50
- Downloads33
- Abstract Views17
Artifact Description
Subsurface Hydraulic Studies and Modeling to Support Injection Treatment and Hydraulic Containment at Impacted Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Sites Authors Dr. Ali Meyal - United States - Anchor QEA Dr. Jim Redwine - United States - Anchor QEA Mr. Alexander Macbeth - United States - Anchor QEA Mr. Mike Gefell - United States - Anchor QEA Mr. Chuck Pippin - United States - Anchor QEA Abstract In situ injection for remediation of CCP constituents in groundwater could save millions of dollars at CCP sites compared to conventional technologies. Hydraulic containment is also a selected remedy at many CCP sites. Anchor QEA is using aquifer hydraulic characteristics at several CCP sites to evaluate the injectability of bedrock aquifers and using modeling to design an effective in situ treatment pilot test. The evaluation can also be applied to hydraulic containment to assess and design that corrective measure, if needed. Anchor QEA defined potential remediation areas (PRAs) based on sustainable injection rate, injected solution travel time, radius of influence, accessibility, and depth of treatment zone. These elements were determined using hydraulic gradients, bulk hydraulic conductivities, treatment zone interval depths, and fracture porosities. The resulting hydrogeologic conceptual site models are being used to conduct numerical solute transport modeling to evaluate how the flow field and the injection scenarios control contaminant degradation rates at CCP sites, enabling optimum design. The modeling employs various active spreading techniques under different injection scenarios, such as injection locations and sequencing, and using push-pull methods.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know