Introduction: Rethinking Dubliners: A Case for What Happens in Joyce's Stories
2017
- 55Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage55
- Abstract Views55
Book Chapter Description
More than a century ago, James Joyce published Dubliners, and since then, readers, scholars, and academics have vigorously discussed and interpreted the stories and the collection from perspectives that have become by 2016, it seems to us, in need of reorientation. Readers have come not only to accept these readings, but also to internalize them, understanding them as a kind of gospel truth. In Rethinking “Dubliners,” the editors take up a challenge that Fritz Senn gave Joyceans at the end of the twentieth century, hoping to put “descriptive possibility” not just on the critical periphery of writing about Dubliners, but also at the front and center, as a necessary movement forward in scholarly approaches to Joyce’s famous stories. Moreover, in the centenary year of the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland and just over one hundred years after Joyce gave us our beloved short stories, we urge readers of Dubliners to reconsider the traditional tropes of paralysis and stagnation in favor of movement and change.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know