The Effect of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Water Quality of the Nemasket River
2008
- 234Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage234
- Downloads186
- Abstract Views48
Lecture / Presentation Description
Students studied the effect of the Middleboro Waste Treatment Plant on the water quality of the Nemasket River. Students sampled for DO, temperature, pH, nutrients and macroinvertebrates. Sampling sites included the reference site at Rte 105 and the impact site at Murdock Street in Middleboro, MA. A recovery site was not sampled due to distance and time constraints. Students toured the treatment plant and interviewed Mr. Joseph Ciaglo to learn how the plant operated. Students learned that orthophosphates are removed using ferric chloride to precipitate the phosphate. The analysis of samples for orthophosphate showed that the concentrations at Murdock Street were above normal range but below the concentration of Rte 105 on only one occasion. However, the concentration and load of nitrogen as nitrate was consistently higher at Murdock Street on each sampling date. The students learned that the treatment plant removes ammonia from the waste, not nitrate. Hence, total nitrogen reaching the water column meets NYPDES regulations for the plant, but nitrogen is still impacting the water quality.This impact can also be seen in the diversity of macroinvertebrates and in the Hilsenhoff 10-max Biotic Index. The HBI was 4.5 at Rte 105 indicating “good” water quality. Murdock Street had a value of 5.6 indicating “fair” water quality. The students concluded that even though the waste treatment plant meets NYPDES requirements, it still impacts the water quality of the Nemasket River.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know