It takes a village (and a lot of documentation): Managing electronic resources
2017
- 560Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage560
- Downloads397
- Abstract Views163
Lecture / Presentation Description
Susan DiRenzo Ashby, Associate Professor, Systems Coordinator, University Libraries, The University of Akron Mike Monaco, Coordinator, Cataloging Services, University Libraries, The University of Akron Academic libraries need to manage multiple collections of electronic resources and it takes cooperation across multiple units such as acquisitions, cataloging, and systems. The collections come from various vendors and the records they supply often need different local edits and these might be most efficiently handled with MarcEdit or the ILS’s load tables and global updates. Who is responsible for calling the vendor when there is a problem with record delivery? Who reviews the records for quality? Who loads the records and what pre- or post-load edits does each collection need?Learn how The University of Akron has created and documented procedures to ensure that each collection is kept up to date in the catalog and everyone knows who is responsible for dealing with the vendors and loading and maintaining the MARC records. We’ll share how we tailor “Loading guides” for each collection that document the nature and source of the collection, who is responsible for each task involved in acquiring and maintaining the collections, the local edits we make, and how to do them. We’ll also discuss how we periodically audit the collections for completeness and consistency, and some other innovations we are working on to improve access.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know