Empirical analysis and enlightenment of American NuVal scoring labeling development
Food and Machinery, ISSN: 1003-5788, Vol: 37, Issue: 8, Page: 12-15
2021
- 28Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage28
- Downloads21
- Abstract Views7
Article Description
NuVal scoring labeling thai was based on overall nutritional quality index, adopted 1 to 100 to show the nutritional value of packaged food and fresh agricultural products. The higher was the score, the better was the nutritional status of food. The labeling was integrated with food prices to make it easier for consumers to compare the nutritional value of what they pay. Therefore. FOP labeling in China could be attempted to integrate nutrition evaluation information with food price, and promote in fresh agricultural products, and adjust its algorithm in accordance with the national nutritional needs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201313111&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.08.002; https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol37/iss8/2; https://www.ifoodmm.cn/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1809&context=journal; https://dx.doi.org/10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.08.002; https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.08.002
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know