Improving glycemic control among incarcerated men: A health promotion model
2016
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Downloads6
Lecture / Presentation Description
Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015:Statement of Problem: In California's state prison system, diabetic inmates are fed the same diet as the rest of the prison population, and many have poor blood glucose control. A current program allows certain inmates to carry glucometers and testing supplies and to test their blood sugar but improvements in glycemic control have been modest. This innovation sought to learn if improved health literacy would result in a reduction in HbA1c in an environment in which no variables such as dietary changes or other rewards were offered.Methodology: Utilizing the Health Promotion Model as a framework that includes nursing and behavioral science perspectives, nursing-led education which was supported by other disciplines aimed to improve health literacy. Diabetic inmates who expressed a desire to participate were permitted to carry a glucometer and supplies and were given individualized diabetes education. During scheduled appointments, medical and mental health care providers reinforced information and a dietician was available to help the patient learn more about the meals that were provided to him. Participants were re-assessed for improvements in HbA1c at least every 6 months.Description of Innovation: Evidence and theory-based strategies were incorporated into the intervention. Research indicates that individuals who are involved in their health care decisions are more likely to take action and make a behavior change; therefore the intervention was aimed at increasing autonomy and participatory behavior. Because research has also shown that self-monitoring strategies increase compliance with goals of glycemic control, inmates were encouraged to test their blood sugar as desired and to keep a record for review. Evidence indicates that social support is a strong predictor of success with changing behavior; therefore a collaborative team acknowledged and encouraged the patient's effort.Implications for Research: Further study is needed to develop interventions specifically designed for incarcerated diabetics. Poor health literacy, depression and lack of autonomy may be barriers to glycemic control for incarcerated diabetics. Peer and organizational support, a self-testing program and education may improve glycemic control.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know