Anesthesia protocol for bariatric surgery: A quality improvement process
2024
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Downloads4
- Abstract Views2
Other Description
Objective: The purpose of this quality improvement process was to review current enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for bariatric surgeries, analyze the current anesthesia protocol used at a midwestern medical center, and propose potential system modifications for best practice in the bariatric surgical population.Methods: All articles published between 2009 and March 2019 that contained specific keywords were critically appraised or discarded. Additional articles were discovered through cross references from previously found articles.Major points: The midwestern medical center protocol reviewed followed ERAS guidelines closely. Both parties agreed on the use of antiemetics, multimodal analgesics, positioning, oxygen therapy, and use of a neuromuscular blocking agent followed by reversal. The midwestern medical center was more specific in some areas but all remained within recommendations by ERAS. ERAS guidelines were more complete in recommendations for lung protective strategies and intravenous fluid management.Conclusion: Many of the elements included in the midwestern medical centers protocol, if not already in agreement with ERAS guidelines, was supported by more recently published studies. Recommendations for the midwestern medical center were made as potential system modifications with the intent of minimizing perioperative complications in the bariatric patient population.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know