Exploring the comfort experience of adolescents with metastatic cancer
2013
- 3Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3
- Downloads2
- Abstract Views1
Lecture / Presentation Description
Session presented on: Friday, July 26, 2013:Purpose: Adolescents with cancer are challenged not only by the biophysical and emotional changes of a normally developing person; also pain and distress from their treatment affecting their quality of life. Most of our knowledge about adolescent comfort experience is derived from parent and staff perspectives. Parents cannot speak everything about their children. There is more to know about them being the least investigated age group. This study explored the meaning and significance of comfort experienced by adolescents with metastatic or progressive cancer.Methods: Descriptive phenomenology was used to uncover the comfort experience of adolescents with metastatic or progressive cancer. This qualitative study utilized purposive sampling to recruit patients who were 15-21 years old, undergoing treatment for their disease in a children's cancer hospital of a large tertiary cancer institution. Kolcaba's comfort theory was used as the framework of the study. A questionnaire identified the demographics of the participants. Semi-structured interview questionnaire designed by the research team guided the interviews and explored the depth and breadth of the participants' lived experience.Results: Van Manen's method was used to analyze data from thirteen ethnically diverse middle and late adolescents who mostly had progressive disease. Eight broad themes emerged from their statements. They reported distorted body image, shock from the diagnosis, uncertain future, isolation from friends, help from Higher Being, existential well -being, social support from family, friends, health providers, and the uniquely adolescent environment. Their experiences fit the definition of comfort in Kolcaba's theory. Comfort improved their wellbeing and helped them cope with the debilitating effects of cancer.Conclusion: Comfort is significant to these adolescents because it gave them hope, motivation, and the will power to live. Healthcare staff should be sensitive for the presence of distressing symptoms and develop a standard of care to address the comfort needs of adolescents.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know