Application of root cause analysis to improve the safety of patients: A case study of adverse event
2014
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Downloads6
Poster Description
Session presented on Sunday, July 27, 2014:Purpose: Head trauma and limb fracture are common consequences of falls in children. The aim of this study was to describe the adverse event with falls children in hospitalized. We used root cause analysis to survey the adverse event on practices relevant to improving patient safety.Methods: The setting of this study was about a 24-bed pediatric oncology ward in northern regional teaching hospital in Taiwan from January, 2010 to November, 2013. The first applied instrument was based on literatures review. We would retrospectively chart review and 'reporting system of medical incidents' describing in detail the adverse event and activities to leading up this. Then, we constructed the event diagram to show the steps in the process where fail maybe. We were made based on these root cause to avoid adverse events.Results: The total errors events 23 adverse events (Systemic errors: 2; personal errors: 21). We found those questions: 1. Children are largely dependent on the age of the child is main risk factor. Mean age of the children was 5.8 years old. More than half of all fall-related childhood injuries occur among children age 3 years (about 56.6%). 2. Lack of main caregiver on the alert (lack of main caregiver watched closely) is a common cause of falls (about 86%).Conclusion: Falls are a leading cause of children morbidity, mortality and high risk of interruption or delaying chemotherapy in cancer patients. Based on our results, we suggested to provide appropriate the tools to educate children and main caregivers of the potential risk of falls and was to develop individualized management plans of care to reduce risk for high risk children.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know